O critical legal studies movement de Roberto Mangabeira Unger: Um clássico da filosofia jurídica e política

Arnaldo Sampaio de Moraes Godoy

Artigos

v. 8 n. 82 (2007)

O critical legal studies movement de Roberto Mangabeira Unger: Um clássico da filosofia jurídica e política

Arnaldo Sampaio de Moraes Godoy^▸^▾

PDF

Enviado: 5 março 2015

Resumo

O presente artigo pretende apresentar o livro The Critical Legal Studies
Movement, de Roberto Mangabeira Unger, bem como representa esforço no sentido de se ler abertamente esse clássico. Ainda não traduzido para o português, esse livro acena com percepções muito apropriadas para a compreensão de enigmas que se tem quanto à relação entre Direito e Política.

Referências

ANDERSON, Perry. Afinidades seletivas. Tradução de Paulo Cesar Castanheira. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2002.
BALL, Milner S. The city of Unger. Northwestern University Law Review, v. 81, 1986.
BICKEL, Alexander M. The least dangerous branch. New Haven: Yale University, 1986.
CHRISTODOULIDIS, Emilios A. The inertia of institutional imagination: a reply to Roberto Unger. Modern Law Review, v. 59, 1996.
DEVLIN, Richard F. On the road to radical reform: a critical review of Unger´s politics. Osgoode Law Journal, v. 28, 1990.
DOREN, John W. Van. Understanding Unger. William Mitchell College of Law Review, v. 16, 1990.
DUXBURY, Neil T. Look back in Unger: a retrospective appraisal of law in modern society. Modern Law Review, v. 49, 1986.
ELY, John Hart. Democracy and distrust. Cambridge: Harvard University, 2002.
EWALD, Willliam. Unger´s Philosophy: a critical legal study. Yale Law Journal, v. 97, 1987.
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence. The law and society movement. Stanford Law Review, v. 38, 1985.
GODOY, Arnaldo Sampaio de Moraes. Introdução ao Movimento Critical Legal Studies. Porto Alegre: Sérgio Antonio Fabris, 2005.
GOLDSTEIN, Howard. The limits of politics: a deep ecological critique of Roberto Unger. McGill Law Journal, v. 34, 1988.
HAMILTON, Alexander; JAY, John; MADISON, James. The federalist papers. New York: Bantam Books, 1982.
HARRIS, J. W. Unger´s critique of formalism in legal reasoning: Hero, Hercules, and Humdrum. The Modern Law Review, v. 52, 1989.
HUTHCHINSON, Allan C.; MONAHAN, Patrick J. The "Rights" Stuff": Roberto Unger and beyond. Texas Law Review, v. 62, 1983.
UNGER, Mangabeira Roberto. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1986.
MILLER, Jeremy. A critical analysis of the theories of professor Unger. Western State Law Review, v. 12, 1984.
PANNIER, Russell. Roberto Unger and the Critical Legal Studies Movement: an examination and evaluation. William Mitchell College of Law Review, v. 13, 1987.
PARSONS, Talcott. Roberto Mangabeira Unger. Law in Modern Society. Law and Sociology Review, v. 12, 1977.
RAWLS, John. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University, 2000.
RORTY, Richard. Unger, Castoriadis, and the romance of national future. In: LOVIN, Robin W.; PERRY, Michael J. Critique and Construction, a Symposium on Roberto Unger´s Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1990.
SCHLAG, Pierre. The enchantment of reason. Durham; Londres: Duke University, 1998.
SIMON, William H. Social theory and political practice: Unger´s brazilian journalism. In: LOVIN, Robin W.; PERRY, Michael J. Critique and Construction, a Symposium on Roberto Unger´s Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1990.
SPITZ, Derek. Solidarity and disaggregated rights property rights: Roberto Unger´s recasting of Democracy. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, v. 23, 1991.
SUNSTEIN, Cass. Routine and revolution. In: LOVIN, Robin W.; PERRY, Michael J. Critique and Construction, a Symposium on Roberto Unger´s Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1990.
TRIBE, Laurence H. American constitutional law. New York: Foundation Press, 2003.
TUCKER, D. E. B. Unger on liberalism. Bull. Austl. Soc. Leg. Phil., v. 11, 1987.
TUSHNET, Mark. Critical legal studies: an introduction to its origins and underpinnings. Journal of Legal Education, v. 36, 1986.
________. Taking the Constitution away from the Courts. Princeton: Princeton University, 1999.
WHITE, G. Edward. From sociological jurisprudence to realism: jurisprudence and social change in early twentieth-century America. Virginia Law Review, v. 58, 1972.
________. Intervention and detachment. New York: Oxford University, 1994.

Declaração de Direito Autoral

[1] ANDERSON, Perry. Afinidades seletivas. Tradução de Paulo Cesar Castanheira. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2002.

[2] BALL, Milner S. The city of Unger. Northwestern University Law Review, v. 81, 1986.

[3] BICKEL, Alexander M. The least dangerous branch. New Haven: Yale University, 1986.

[4] CHRISTODOULIDIS, Emilios A. The inertia of institutional imagination: a reply to Roberto Unger. Modern Law Review, v. 59, 1996.

[5] DEVLIN, Richard F. On the road to radical reform: a critical review of Unger´s politics. Osgoode Law Journal, v. 28, 1990.

[6] DOREN, John W. Van. Understanding Unger. William Mitchell College of Law Review, v. 16, 1990.

[7] DUXBURY, Neil T. Look back in Unger: a retrospective appraisal of law in modern society. Modern Law Review, v. 49, 1986.

[8] ELY, John Hart. Democracy and distrust. Cambridge: Harvard University, 2002.

[9] EWALD, Willliam. Unger´s Philosophy: a critical legal study. Yale Law Journal, v. 97, 1987.

[10] FRIEDMAN, Lawrence. The law and society movement. Stanford Law Review, v. 38, 1985.

[11] GODOY, Arnaldo Sampaio de Moraes. Introdução ao Movimento Critical Legal Studies. Porto Alegre: Sérgio Antonio Fabris, 2005.

[12] GOLDSTEIN, Howard. The limits of politics: a deep ecological critique of Roberto Unger. McGill Law Journal, v. 34, 1988.

[13] HAMILTON, Alexander; JAY, John; MADISON, James. The federalist papers. New York: Bantam Books, 1982.

[14] HARRIS, J. W. Unger´s critique of formalism in legal reasoning: Hero, Hercules, and Humdrum. The Modern Law Review, v. 52, 1989.

[15] HUTHCHINSON, Allan C.; MONAHAN, Patrick J. The "Rights" Stuff": Roberto Unger and beyond. Texas Law Review, v. 62, 1983.

[16] UNGER, Mangabeira Roberto. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge: Harvard University, 1986.

[17] MILLER, Jeremy. A critical analysis of the theories of professor Unger. Western State Law Review, v. 12, 1984.

[18] PANNIER, Russell. Roberto Unger and the Critical Legal Studies Movement: an examination and evaluation. William Mitchell College of Law Review, v. 13, 1987.

[19] PARSONS, Talcott. Roberto Mangabeira Unger. Law in Modern Society. Law and Sociology Review, v. 12, 1977.

[20] RAWLS, John. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University, 2000.

[21] RORTY, Richard. Unger, Castoriadis, and the romance of national future. In: LOVIN, Robin W.; PERRY, Michael J. Critique and Construction, a Symposium on Roberto Unger´s Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1990.

[22] SCHLAG, Pierre. The enchantment of reason. Durham; Londres: Duke University, 1998.

[23] SIMON, William H. Social theory and political practice: Unger´s brazilian journalism. In: LOVIN, Robin W.; PERRY, Michael J. Critique and Construction, a Symposium on Roberto Unger´s Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1990.

[24] SPITZ, Derek. Solidarity and disaggregated rights property rights: Roberto Unger´s recasting of Democracy. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, v. 23, 1991.

[25] SUNSTEIN, Cass. Routine and revolution. In: LOVIN, Robin W.; PERRY, Michael J. Critique and Construction, a Symposium on Roberto Unger´s Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1990.

[26] TRIBE, Laurence H. American constitutional law. New York: Foundation Press, 2003.

[27] TUCKER, D. E. B. Unger on liberalism. Bull. Austl. Soc. Leg. Phil., v. 11, 1987.

[28] TUSHNET, Mark. Critical legal studies: an introduction to its origins and underpinnings. Journal of Legal Education, v. 36, 1986.

[29] ________. Taking the Constitution away from the Courts. Princeton: Princeton University, 1999.

[30] WHITE, G. Edward. From sociological jurisprudence to realism: jurisprudence and social change in early twentieth-century America. Virginia Law Review, v. 58, 1972.

[31] ________. Intervention and detachment. New York: Oxford University, 1994.