Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o rodapé
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Artigos em Língua Estrangeira

v. 23 n. 131 (2022)

Discussions on the alleged (dis)regard with the abductor´s gender in international child abductions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.20499/2236-3645.RJP2022v23e131-1806
Enviado
2 julho 2018
Publicado
28-01-2022

Resumo

Since the 80´s, the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of Child Abduction, a multilateral treaty that, despite of using an alleged neutral and gender-unaware language, ends up by striking negatively a relevant number of women-mothers. Although the initial negotiation scenario of this treaty pointed to a higher number of male abductors, this has changed over the years and, nowadays, mothers perpetrate the highest number of abductions. Thus, the present study aims to engage on a critical debate about countries´ efforts to defend their nationals, men-fathers, against the illicit removal of children from their territories, applying the methodological approach offered by feminist theories which challenge notions of objectivity and gender neutrality in the field of Law, especially at the realms of the 1980 Hague Convention.

Referências

  1. BARTLETT, Katharine T. Feminist legal methods. In: BARLETT, K. T; KENNEDY, R. Feminist legal theory. Colorado: Westview Press, 1991.
  2. BODENHEIMER, B. M. L. The Hague Draft Convention on International Child Abduction. Family Law Quarterly. New York, vol. 14, 1980-1981, pp. 99-120.
  3. BRAZIL. Decreto nº 3.413, de 14 de abril de 2000. Convenção sobre os Aspectos Civis do Seqüestro Internacional de Crianças. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, 2000. Disponível em http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto/d3413.htm. Acesso em 17.05.2018.
  4. CAMPOS, Carmen Hein de. Razão e Sensibilidade: teoria feminista do direito e Lei Maria da Penha. In: CAMPOS, Carmen Hein (org.). Lei Maria da Penha Comentada em uma perspectiva jurídico-feminista. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2011.
  5. . Teoria Feminista do Direito e Violência Íntima contra Mulheres. Revista EMERJ. Rio de Janeiro, v. 15, n. 57 (edição especial), jan./março, 2012, pp. 33-42.
  6. CASALEIRO, Paula. O poder do direito e o poder do feminismo: revisão crítica da proposta teórica de Carol Smart. Revista Ex aequo. Vila Franca de Xira (Portugal), n. 29, 2014, pp. 39- 53.
  7. HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW (HAGUE CONFERENCE). Actes et documents de la Quatorzième session (1980) - Child Abduction. Netherlands: Hague Conference on Private International Law, 1982.
  8. . Statistical Analysis of Applications made in 1999 under the 1980 Convention - Part I (Prel. Doc. No 3 of November 2001). Netherlands: Hague Conference on Private International Law, 2001.
  9. . A statistical analysis of applications made in 2003 under The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, 2007 update (Prel. Doc. No 3, Part I, of September 2008). Netherlands: Hague Conference on Private International Law, 2008.
  10. . Statistical analysis of applications made in 2008 under The Hague Child Abduction Convention, Parts I-III (National, Regional and Global Reports). Netherlands: Hague Conference on Private International Law, 2011.
  11. ________. Draft Guide to Good Practice on Article 13(1)(b) of The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Preliminary Document n. 3 of June 2017 for the attention of the 7th Special Commission on the Practical Operation of The Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. Netherlands: Hague Conference on Private International Law, 2017.
  12. ________. Conclusions and Recommendations adopted by the Special Commission on the practical operation of the 1980 and 1996 Hague Conventions (10-17 October 2017). Netherlands: Hague Conference on Private International Law, 2018.
  13. JARAMILLO, Isabel Cristina. “La crítica feminista al decreto”. In: WEST, Robin. Genero y teoria del derecho. Bogota: Ediciones Uniandes, 2000.
  14. LETO, M. Whose best interest? International Child Abduction under The Hague Convention. Chicago Journal of International Law. Chicago, vol. 3, n. 1, Article 22, 2002, pp. 247-253.
  15. LEVIT, Nancy; VERCHICK, Robert R.M. Feminist legal theory: a primer. New York: New York University Press, 2006.
  16. MARTINS, Natalia Camba Subtração Internacional de Crianças: as exceções à obrigação de retorno previstas na Convenção da Haia de 1980 sobre os Aspectos Civis do Sequestro Internacional de Crianças – Interpretação judicial da adaptação da criança. Curitiba: CRV, 2013.
  17. McCORKER, Jill; SCHMITT, Frederika E.; HANS, Valerie P. Gender, Law and Justice”. In: SANDERS, Joseph; HAMILTON, V. Lee (edit.). Handbook of justice research in law, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2000.
  18. PÉREZ-VERA, Eliza. Explanatory Report on the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention. Netherlands: Hague Conference on Private International Law, 1982.
  19. SMART, Carol. Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge, 1989.
  20. . Law, Crime and Sexuality. Essays in Feminism. London: Sage, 1999.
  21. . La teoria feminista y el discurso juridico. In: BIRGIN, Haydée. El derecho en el genero y el genero en el derecho. Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos, 2000.
  22. ________. From children´s shoes to children´s voices. Family Court Review. Washington, vol. 40, n. 3, Jul/y 2002, pp. 307-319.
  23. SMART, Carol.; MAY, Vanessa. Why can´t they agree? The underlying complexity of contact and residence disputes. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. Abingdon, vol. 26, n. 4, p. 347-360, 2004.
  24. SCHUZ, R.. Disparity and the Quest for Uniformity in Implementing The Hague Abduction Convention. Journal of Comparative Law. Oxford, vol. 9, n. 1, 2014, p. 3-48.