Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o rodapé
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Artigos em Língua Estrangeira

v. 21 n. 125 (2020)

Biopolitics in end-of-life care

DOI
https://doi.org/10.20499/2236-3645.RJP2020v21e125-1759
Enviado
22 junho 2018
Publicado
30-01-2020

Resumo

This paper analyzes the biopolitical construction of ethical criteria adopted when providing end-of-life care. The evaluation of how medical knowledge prescriptions are applied to patients’ living bodies, and how legal power prescriptions are applied to health professionals’ living bodies, evidenced that medical practice undergoes a double dilemma: on the one hand, the lack of criteria for the choice of non-curative treatment; on the other, the technological blurring of the demarcation line between life and death. This insecurity turns the hospital environment into a state of exception, where all of us become exposed to the violence of a force-of-law directly applied to our bodies as bare life. Using the Brazilian legislation as a singular starting point, general concepts are discussed reflecting current paradigms in end-of-life care.

Referências

  1. Bibliographical References
  2. AGAMBEN, Giorgio (1998). Homo Sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  3. __________ (2005). State of Exception. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  4. __________ (2011). The Sacrament of Language: An Archeology of the Oath (Homo Sacer II, 3). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  5. ANNAS, G. J. (2005). Culture of life politics at the bedside – the case of Terri Schiavo. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, no 16, p. 1710-1715.
  6. ALPERS, A. (1998). Criminal Act or Palliative Care? Prosecutions involving the care of the dying, The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 26, no 4, p. 308-331.
  7. BEAUCHAMP, Tom L. & CHILDRESS, James F (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7th Ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. BLANK, R. H. (2011). End of life decision making across cultures, The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39, nº 2, p. 201-214.
  9. BITENCOURT, Cezar Roberto (2012). Tratado de Direito Penal – Parte Especial 2: Dos Crimes contra a Pessoa. 12a ed. São Paulo: Saraiva.
  10. BUITING, H. M.; vAN DER HEIDE, A.; ONWUTEAKA-PHILIPSEN, B. D.; RURUP, M. L.; RIETJENS, J. A. C.; BORSBOOM, G.; VAN DER MAAS, P. J.; VAN DELDEN, J. J. M. (2010). Physicians’ labelling of end-of-life practices: a hypothetical case study, in: Journal of Medical Ethics, nº 36. London: BMJ, p. 24-29.
  11. FOUCAULT, Michel (2001). Il faut défendre la societé. Paris: Gallimard Seuil.
  12. ___________ (2004). Securité, Territoire, Population. Lonrai: Gallimard/Seuil.
  13. KOMPANJE, Erwin; PIERS, Ruth; BENOIT, Dominique (2013). Causes and consequences of disproportionate care in intensive care medicine, in: Current Opinion in Critical Care, vol. 19, no 6. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, p. 630-635.
  14. KUSCHNER, W. G.; GRUENEWALD, D. A.; CLUM, N.; BEAL, A.; EZEJI-OKOYE, S. C. (2009). Implementation of ICU palliative care guidelines and procedures: a quality improvement initiative following an investigation of alleged euthanasia, Chest 135, no 1, p. 26-32.
  15. LEVI, Primo (1998). The Drowned and the Saved. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  16. SEALE, Clave (2009). Hastening death in end-of-life care: a survey of doctors, in: Social Science & Medicine, nº 69. London: Elsevier, p. 1659-1666.
  17. SMETS, Tinne; COHEN, Joachim; BILSEN, Joan; WESEMAEL, Yanna Van; RURUP, Mette L.; DELIENS, Luc (2010). The labelling and reporting of euthanasia by Belgian physicians: a study of hypothetical cases, in: European Journal of Public Health, vol. 22, nº 1. London: Oxford University Press, European Public Health Association, p. 19-26.
  18. WENDLER, David; RID, Annette (2011). Systematic review: the effect on surrogates of making treatment decisions for others, in: Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 154, no 5. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians, p. 336-346.